GPT-4o vs Claude 4.5 Opus

1. High-intelligence, general-purpose model

• Strong reasoning, creativity, summarization, and problem-solving.
• Great balance of speed, accuracy, and cost.

2. Multimodal input support

• Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning, extraction, or description.
• Output is text only, making it predictable for production.

3. Excellent for structured and unstructured tasks

• Performs well on Q&A, writing, analysis, classification, chat, and planning.
• Supports Structured Outputs, making it suitable for deterministic workflows.

4. Strong tool-use capabilities

• Supports function calling, API orchestration, and tool-augmented workflows.
• Integrates well with assistants, batch operations, and automation pipelines.

5. Large context for complex tasks

• 128K context allows multi-document reasoning, multi-step conversations, and large input payloads.

6. Production-ready reliability

• Stable outputs, predictable behaviors, and broad modality coverage.
• Supported across all major API endpoints.

7. Lower latency than o-series reasoning models

• Faster responses due to no dedicated reasoning step.
• Ideal for interactive or near-real-time applications.

8. Fine-tuning and distillation supported

• Enables specialization for domain-specific tasks.
• Distillation helps create smaller, efficient custom models.

1. Maximum capability with more practical pricing

• Anthropic introduced Opus 4.5 as its most intelligent model, combining maximum capability with practical performance.
• It was positioned as the best model in the world for coding, agents, and computer use at launch, with pricing reduced to $5/M input and $25/M output.

2. Step-change gains for coding and advanced agent work

• Anthropic describes Opus 4.5 as state-of-the-art on real-world software engineering tests.
• It also improved everyday knowledge-work tasks like deep research, slides, and spreadsheets while staying strong on long-horizon agent workflows.

3. Better control over reasoning depth

• Opus 4.5 introduced the effort parameter, letting developers trade off response thoroughness against token efficiency.
• This made it easier to use one flagship model across both high-depth analysis and more cost-sensitive production workloads.

4. Stronger computer use and continuity

• Added enhanced computer use with a zoom action for inspecting detailed screen regions.
• Preserves prior thinking blocks across turns, helping the model maintain reasoning continuity in extended multi-step tasks.