o1 vs Claude 4.5 Opus

1. Full-scale reasoning model

• Uses reinforcement learning to generate long internal chains of thought.
• Suitable for tasks requiring deep logic, multi-step planning, and rich analytical reasoning.

2. Strong performance across domains

• Excellent at math, science, coding, and structured analytical work.
• Handles multi-step workflows and complex problem-solving with high consistency.

3. High output capacity (100K tokens)

• Enables long, detailed explanations, large documents, and multi-part analyses.

4. Image-understanding capable

• Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning and mixed-modality tasks.
• Output is text only, optimized for clear explanations.

5. Advanced API compatibility

• Works with Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
• Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs.

6. Stable long-context performance

• 200K-token context window supports large files, multi-document analysis, and extended conversations.

7. Designed for correctness-oriented workloads

• Prioritizes rigorous reasoning over speed.
• Useful in auditing, verification, scientific thinking, policy analysis, and legal-style reasoning.

8. Powerful but expensive

• High token costs make it suitable for selective, mission-critical reasoning rather than high-volume usage.

1. Maximum capability with more practical pricing

• Anthropic introduced Opus 4.5 as its most intelligent model, combining maximum capability with practical performance.
• It was positioned as the best model in the world for coding, agents, and computer use at launch, with pricing reduced to $5/M input and $25/M output.

2. Step-change gains for coding and advanced agent work

• Anthropic describes Opus 4.5 as state-of-the-art on real-world software engineering tests.
• It also improved everyday knowledge-work tasks like deep research, slides, and spreadsheets while staying strong on long-horizon agent workflows.

3. Better control over reasoning depth

• Opus 4.5 introduced the effort parameter, letting developers trade off response thoroughness against token efficiency.
• This made it easier to use one flagship model across both high-depth analysis and more cost-sensitive production workloads.

4. Stronger computer use and continuity

• Added enhanced computer use with a zoom action for inspecting detailed screen regions.
• Preserves prior thinking blocks across turns, helping the model maintain reasoning continuity in extended multi-step tasks.