GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude 4.5 Opus

1. Extremely low-cost text model

• One of the cheapest legacy models available.
• Suitable for very high-volume workloads with simple requirements.

2. Good for lightweight NLP tasks

• Classification, summarization, rewriting, paraphrasing, intent detection.
• Works for simple logic tasks and short reasoning sequences.

3. Works well for basic chatbots

• Optimized for Chat Completions API, originally powering early ChatGPT use cases.
• Good for rule-based or templated conversation flows.

4. Stable and predictable outputs

• Legacy behavior makes it suitable for systems built years ago that rely on its quirks.
• Good for backward compatibility or long-term enterprise pipelines.

5. Supports fine-tuning

• Useful for teams maintaining older fine-tuned GPT-3.5 models.
• Allows domain-specific compression of older datasets.

6. Limited capabilities compared to newer models

• No vision, no audio, no streaming, and no function calling.
• Much weaker reasoning and correctness vs GPT-4o mini or GPT-5.1.

7. Small context window (16K)

• Limited for multi-document tasks or long conversations.
• Best used for short, simple prompts or structured tasks.

8. Recommended migration path

• OpenAI explicitly recommends using GPT-4o mini instead.
• 4o mini is cheaper, smarter, faster, multimodal, and far more capable.

1. Maximum capability with more practical pricing

• Anthropic introduced Opus 4.5 as its most intelligent model, combining maximum capability with practical performance.
• It was positioned as the best model in the world for coding, agents, and computer use at launch, with pricing reduced to $5/M input and $25/M output.

2. Step-change gains for coding and advanced agent work

• Anthropic describes Opus 4.5 as state-of-the-art on real-world software engineering tests.
• It also improved everyday knowledge-work tasks like deep research, slides, and spreadsheets while staying strong on long-horizon agent workflows.

3. Better control over reasoning depth

• Opus 4.5 introduced the effort parameter, letting developers trade off response thoroughness against token efficiency.
• This made it easier to use one flagship model across both high-depth analysis and more cost-sensitive production workloads.

4. Stronger computer use and continuity

• Added enhanced computer use with a zoom action for inspecting detailed screen regions.
• Preserves prior thinking blocks across turns, helping the model maintain reasoning continuity in extended multi-step tasks.