Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGPT-5 ProClaude 4.7 Opus

GPT-5 Pro vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Compare GPT-5 Pro and Claude 4.7 Opus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 ProClaude 4.7 Opus
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$5.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$120.00/ 1M tokens
$25.00/ 1M tokens

Build AI powered apps

Create internal tools for your work that are powered by GPT-5 Pro, Claude 4.7 Opus, and other AI models. Just describe what you need and Appaca will create it for you.

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5 Pro

OpenAI

1. Highest reasoning quality in the GPT-5 family

  • Uses significantly more compute to "think harder" before responding.
  • Designed for the toughest reasoning tasks where answer quality matters more than speed.
  • Produces more precise, reliable, and detailed outputs than standard GPT-5.

2. Advanced multi-turn reasoning via Responses API

  • Available only in the Responses API to support:
    • Multi-turn internal model interactions before returning a reply.
    • Advanced control patterns (e.g., background mode for long-running jobs).
  • Ideal for complex workflows, deep planning, and multi-step analysis.

3. Configured for maximum effort by default

  • Always runs with reasoning.effort: 'high' (no lower-effort mode).
  • Prioritizes depth and correctness over latency and cost.

4. Multimodal input

  • Accepts text + image as input.
  • Outputs text, with strong instruction-following and analysis capabilities.

5. Tooling and ecosystem integration

  • Supports Web Search, File Search, and Image Generation (as tools).
  • Supports MCP and other Responses API tooling patterns.
  • Does not support Code Interpreter and does not support Computer Use, keeping focus on pure reasoning + tools.

Claude 4.7 Opus

Anthropic

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

  • A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
  • Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks — e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
  • Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

  • Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
  • Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows — designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
  • Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

  • Takes instructions literally and precisely — existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
  • More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

  • Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) — over 3x more than prior Claude models.
  • Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
  • Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

  • State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
  • Strong on legal work — e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
  • Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

  • Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
  • Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
  • Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.

The only platform you need for work apps

Use Appaca to improve your workflows and productivity with the apps you need for your unique use case.