GPT Image 1.5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus

1. State-of-the-Art Image Generation

• Produces high-quality, detailed images optimized for realism, style control and prompt fidelity.
• Designed to handle complex visual scenes, compositions and lighting conditions.

2. Natively Multimodal Architecture

• Understands and reasons over both text and images as inputs.
• Ideal for workflows like editing based on reference images, expanding sketches or mockups and visual concept development.

3. Flexible Output Resolutions & Quality Levels

• Supports multiple resolutions including 1024x1024, 1024x1536 and 1536x1024.
• Offers three quality tiers (Low, Medium, High) to balance cost, speed and maximum detail.

4. Multiple Pricing Models

• Pay-per-token for multimodal input: text tokens and image tokens.
• Pay-per-image generation for final output: low, medium and high quality tiers.
• Enables businesses to balance cost and output needs.

5. Broad Use Cases

• Product photography and marketing assets.
• Illustration, concept art and creative ideation.
• UX/UI mockups.
• Style-guided image creation.
• Generating reference images for design or storytelling.

6. Supported Across Major API Endpoints

• Available via Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants and Images (generations/edits) endpoints.
• Allows tight integration into automated creative pipelines or user-facing apps.

7. Simplified Model Behavior for Stability

• No streaming, function calling, structured outputs or fine-tuning; focused solely on high-quality image generation.

8. Consistent Results via Snapshots

• Supports snapshots for version locking to ensure long-term reproducibility.

9. Ideal For

• Designers, marketers and creatives.
• Product teams needing image assets.
• App builders integrating image generation workflows.
• Agencies producing visual content at scale.

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

• A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
• Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks — e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
• Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

• Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
• Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows — designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
• Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

• Takes instructions literally and precisely — existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
• More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

• Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) — over 3x more than prior Claude models.
• Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
• Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

• State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
• Strong on legal work — e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
• Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

• Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
• Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
• Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.