Claude 4.5 Haiku vs Claude 4 Opus

1. Frontier-level coding at small-model speed

• Similar coding performance to Claude Sonnet 4 at one-third the cost.
• Runs 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5 for many tasks.
• Ideal for real-time pair programming, prototyping, and rapid iteration.

2. Excellent computer-use abilities

• Surpasses Claude Sonnet 4 in certain computer-control tasks.
• Great for agents requiring low-latency tool use (Chrome automation, coding agents, etc.).

3. Perfect for real-time, low-latency applications

• Chat assistants
• Customer support agents
• Interactive development loops
• Multi-agent orchestration

4. Works seamlessly with Sonnet 4.5 in hybrid agent setups

• Sonnet 4.5 plans complex workflows.
• Haiku 4.5 executes subtasks in parallel for speed and cost-efficiency.

5. High alignment & safest Claude model by metric

• Lower misaligned behavior rates than Haiku 3.5, Sonnet 4.5, and Opus 4.1.
• Limited CBRN risk → released under AI Safety Level 2 (ASL-2).

• Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
• Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
• Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
• Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
• Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.