Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGPT-4.1Claude 4 Opus

GPT-4.1 vs Claude 4 Opus

Compare GPT-4.1 and Claude 4 Opus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-4.1Claude 4 Opus
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window1,047,576 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$2.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$8.00/ 1M tokens
$75.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by GPT-4.1, Claude 4 Opus, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-4.1

OpenAI

1. Smartest non-reasoning model

  • Highest intelligence among models without a reasoning step.
  • Great for tasks where speed + accuracy matter without deep chain-of-thought.

2. Excellent instruction following

  • Very strong at structured tasks, formatting, and precise execution.
  • Ideal for productized workflows and deterministic outputs.

3. Reliable tool calling

  • Works smoothly with Web Search, File Search, Image Generation, and Code Interpreter.
  • Supports MCP and advanced tool-enabled API flows.

4. Large 1M-token context window

  • Allows extremely long conversations, large documents, and multi-file use cases.
  • Handles context-heavy tasks without requiring chunking.

5. Low latency (no reasoning step)

  • Faster responses than GPT-5 family when reasoning mode isn't required.
  • More predictable timing for production use.

6. Multimodal input

  • Accepts text + image.
  • Output is text only.

7. Supports fine-tuning

  • Can be fine-tuned for specialized tasks.
  • Also supports distillation for smaller custom models.

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
  • Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
  • Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
  • Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
  • Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
  • Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.