Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGPT-4 TurboClaude 3.5 Sonnet

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Compare GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-4 TurboClaude 3.5 Sonnet
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$10.00/ 1M tokens
$3.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$30.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-4 Turbo

OpenAI

1. Strong reasoning for its generation

  • Next-gen version of GPT-4 designed to be cheaper and faster than the original.
  • Good for analytical tasks, structured writing, coding guidance, and multi-step reasoning.

2. Image input support

  • Accepts images and provides text-only outputs.
  • Useful for OCR, visual Q&A, document extraction, UI analysis, and design interpretation.

3. Stable performance

  • Predictable model behavior suitable for legacy systems still built on GPT-4.
  • Works reliably for established pipelines and enterprise workloads.

4. Large 128K context window

  • Handles long documents, multi-file inputs, or extended conversational sessions.
  • Allows complex prompt chaining and large instruction sets.

5. Broad endpoint compatibility

  • Works with Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime API, Assistants, Batch, Fine-tuning, Embeddings, and more.
  • Supports streaming and function calling.

6. Good choice for cost-controlled GPT-4-class workloads

  • Although older, still useful for teams who want GPT-4-level reasoning without upgrading immediately.
  • A midpoint between legacy GPT-4 and modern GPT-4o/5.1 models.

7. Text-only output simplifies downstream use

  • Ensures deterministic outputs for applications that need reliable text generation.
  • Good for RAG, data pipelines, automation tools, and enterprise systems.

8. Recommended migration path

  • OpenAI now recommends using GPT-4o or GPT-5.1 for improved speed, cost, reasoning, and multimodal capability.
  • GPT-4 Turbo remains available for backward compatibility and stability.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

1. Intelligence & Reasoning

  • Outperforms previous Claude models and competitor LLMs across major benchmarks.
  • Excels in graduate-level reasoning (GPQA), knowledge tasks (MMLU), and coding (HumanEval).
  • Handles nuance, humor, and complex instructions with human-like clarity.

2. Speed & Efficiency

  • Runs 2x faster than Claude 3 Opus, making it ideal for real-time and high-volume workflows.
  • Cost-effective pricing: $3/M input tokens and $15/M output tokens.
  • Supports a 200K token context window, enabling rich, long-form reasoning.

3. Coding Capabilities

  • Solves significantly more coding and bug-fix tasks (64% vs Opus's 38% in internal evaluations).
  • Can autonomously write, edit, and execute code when tool use is enabled.
  • Strong at translating and modernizing legacy codebases.

4. Vision Strength

  • Best vision model in the Claude family, surpassing Opus on vision benchmarks.
  • Excellent at interpreting charts, graphs, and imperfect images.
  • Reliable text extraction from low-quality visuals for retail, logistics, finance, etc.

5. Agentic Workflows

  • Highly capable for multi-step task orchestration.
  • Performs well as the engine for agents requiring reasoning, planning, and tool-calling abilities.

6. Content Quality

  • Produces natural, relatable writing with improved tone, style, and context awareness.
  • Strong at long-form content creation and editing.

7. Safety & Reliability

  • Rated ASL-2, meeting Anthropic's safety standards.
  • Undergoes extensive red-teaming and external evaluation (UK AISI & US AISI).
  • Not trained on user data without explicit permission.