Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM Comparisono3GPT-4o

o3 vs GPT-4o

Compare o3 and GPT-4o. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

Featureo3GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Model Typetexttext
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input Cost
$2.00/ 1M tokens
$2.50/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$8.00/ 1M tokens
$10.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by o3, GPT-4o, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

o3

OpenAI

1. Advanced reasoning capability

  • Designed for multi-step thinking across text, code, and visual inputs.
  • Excels at math, science, logic puzzles, and complex analytical workflows.

2. Strong performance across domains

  • Highly capable in technical writing, data analysis, and structured problem-solving.
  • Useful for research, engineering tasks, and intricate instruction-following.

3. Visual reasoning support

  • Accepts image inputs, enabling tasks such as diagram analysis, chart interpretation, and visual logic assessments.

4. High output capacity

  • Up to 100,000 output tokens, supporting long-form content, technical breakdowns, and multi-part solutions.

5. Excellent instruction following

  • Produces detailed, step-by-step responses for tasks requiring precision and clarity.
  • Ideal for educational explanations, system design reasoning, and code walkthroughs.

6. Large 200K context window

  • Handles long documents, multi-file reasoning, or extended conversations with minimal loss of context.

7. Broad API support

  • Works with Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, Batch, Embeddings, Image Generation, and more.
  • Supports streaming and function calling for advanced workflows.

8. Positioned as a legacy reasoning model

  • Remains extremely capable but formally succeeded by GPT-5, which offers stronger reasoning and performance.

GPT-4o

OpenAI

1. High-intelligence, general-purpose model

  • Strong reasoning, creativity, summarization, and problem-solving.
  • Great balance of speed, accuracy, and cost.

2. Multimodal input support

  • Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning, extraction, or description.
  • Output is text only, making it predictable for production.

3. Excellent for structured and unstructured tasks

  • Performs well on Q&A, writing, analysis, classification, chat, and planning.
  • Supports Structured Outputs, making it suitable for deterministic workflows.

4. Strong tool-use capabilities

  • Supports function calling, API orchestration, and tool-augmented workflows.
  • Integrates well with assistants, batch operations, and automation pipelines.

5. Large context for complex tasks

  • 128K context allows multi-document reasoning, multi-step conversations, and large input payloads.

6. Production-ready reliability

  • Stable outputs, predictable behaviors, and broad modality coverage.
  • Supported across all major API endpoints.

7. Lower latency than o-series reasoning models

  • Faster responses due to no dedicated reasoning step.
  • Ideal for interactive or near-real-time applications.

8. Fine-tuning and distillation supported

  • Enables specialization for domain-specific tasks.
  • Distillation helps create smaller, efficient custom models.