Done comparing? Build a summarisation app powered by GPT-5.5.
Build with GPT-5.5 freeGPT-5.5 vs GPT-5 Codex for Summarisation
Which AI model is better for summarisation? We compare GPT-5.5 and GPT-5 Codex on the criteria that matter most - with a clear verdict.
Why your summarisation LLM choice matters
Effective summarisation requires more than shortening text - it demands identifying what is genuinely important, preserving key nuance, and structuring the output for its intended use. For long documents, large context windows are essential: models that truncate input or hallucinate information they did not actually process are actively counterproductive.
Key evaluation criteria for summarisation
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | GPT-5.5Winner | GPT-5 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Model Type | text | text |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 400,000 tokens |
| Input Cost | $5.00/ 1M tokens | $1.25/ 1M tokens |
| Output Cost | $30.00/ 1M tokens | $10.00/ 1M tokens |
| Top pick for Summarisation |
Strengths for Summarisation
GPT-5.5
OpenAI1. Strongest Agentic Coding Model
- State-of-the-art on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (82.7%), Expert-SWE (73.1%), and SWE-Bench Pro (58.6%), outperforming GPT-5.4 on complex coding tasks.
- Holds context across large systems, reasons through ambiguous failures, and carries changes through surrounding codebases with fewer tokens.
2. Higher Intelligence at GPT-5.4 Latency
- Co-designed, trained, and served on NVIDIA GB200/GB300 NVL72 systems to match GPT-5.4 per-token latency while performing at a significantly higher level.
- Uses fewer tokens to complete the same tasks, making it more efficient as well as more capable.
3. Powerful for Knowledge Work & Computer Use
- Scores 84.9% on GDPval (44 occupations) and 78.7% on OSWorld-Verified for autonomous computer operation.
- Excels at generating documents, spreadsheets, and reports; naturally moves across finding information, using tools, and checking output.
4. Scientific Research Co-Scientist
- Leading performance on GeneBench, BixBench, and FrontierMath; helped discover a new proof about Ramsey numbers verified in Lean.
- Strong enough to meaningfully accelerate progress at the frontiers of biomedical and mathematical research.
GPT-5 Codex
OpenAI1. Purpose-Built for Agentic Coding
- Optimized specifically for scenarios where the model must act as an autonomous or semi-autonomous coding agent.
- Tailored for Codex workflows such as planning, editing, debugging, and multi-step tool-driven code tasks.
2. Advanced Coding Reasoning
- Extends GPT-5's higher reasoning mode to better handle complex software logic and multi-file dependencies.
- Produces more accurate, structured, and maintainable code across modern programming languages.
3. Strong Tool Use in Developer-Like Environments
- Designed for Codex's agent environment, enabling the model to:
- Read and modify files
- Follow function signatures and API contracts
- Navigate codebases with awareness of context and structure
4. Large Context Window for Full-Project Understanding
- 400,000-token context allows ingestion of:
- Entire repositories
- Multiple files at once
- Architectural descriptions
- Enables long-range reasoning across codebases rather than isolated snippets.
5. Multimodal Capability for Development Tasks
- Accepts text and image as input (great for screenshots of error logs, UI mocks, whiteboards).
- Outputs text only, focusing its output precision on code, reasoning, and documentation.
6. Continuous Snapshot Updates
- The underlying model version is regularly upgraded behind the scenes.
- Ensures developers always use the best coding-enhanced GPT-5 variant without changing model names.
7. Reliable Instruction Following
- Very strong adherence to constraints like:
- File/folder structure requirements
- Framework conventions
- Naming patterns
- Linting rules
- Makes it suitable for production coding agents.
8. Broad API Integration
- Available only in the Responses API, giving you:
- Streaming
- Structured outputs
- Function calling
- Allows creation of interactive coding tools and agent workflows with tight model control.
Verdict: Best LLM for Summarisation
For summarisation tasks, GPT-5.5 edges ahead based on its performance profile and design priorities. It scores higher on accuracy and completeness of key information - the criterion that matters most for summarisation workflows.
That said, GPT-5 Codex remains a strong option. If reduction ratio without information loss is a higher priority than raw performance, or if your team is already using OpenAI's tooling, GPT-5 Codex can deliver strong results for summarisation workloads.
With Appaca, you can build summarisation apps powered by either model and switch between them at any time - no rebuild required. Test what actually performs best for your users before committing.
You know GPT-5.5 wins for summarisation. Now build with it.
Most teams spend days comparing models and hours copy-pasting prompts. With Appaca, you build a dedicated summarisation app - powered by GPT-5.5 - in minutes. No code, no re-prompting, runs on any device.
Free to start. Switch models any time. No rebuild required.
Build a summarisation app with GPT-5.5 - freeFrequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 or GPT-5 Codex better for summarisation?
For summarisation tasks, GPT-5.5 has the edge based on its performance profile and design priorities. It ranks higher on accuracy and completeness of key information, which is the most important criterion for summarisation workflows. That said, both models can handle summarisation workloads - the best choice depends on your specific requirements and budget.
What are the key differences between GPT-5.5 and GPT-5 Codex for summarisation?
The main differences are in accuracy and completeness of key information, context window size for long document handling, structured output formats (bullets, sections). GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI and shares the same provider as GPT-5 Codex. Context window, pricing, and speed all differ - check the comparison table above for a side-by-side breakdown.
How much does it cost to use GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5 Codex?
GPT-5 Codex is cheaper at $1.25/million input tokens, versus $5.00/million for GPT-5.5. For summarisation workloads, the total cost difference depends on your average prompt length and volume.
Can I build a summarisation app with GPT-5.5 or GPT-5 Codex?
Yes. Both models can power summarisation applications. With Appaca, you can build a summarisation app using either GPT-5.5 or GPT-5 Codex - and switch between them at any time to find the model that performs best for your specific workflow, without rebuilding your product.
Which model should I choose if I care most about accuracy and completeness of key information?
GPT-5.5 is the stronger choice when accuracy and completeness of key information is your top priority. It ranks #3 overall for summarisation tasks. If cost or latency are constraints, GPT-5 Codex may still meet your needs at a lower cost.