Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonClaude 4 OpusClaude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 4 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Compare Claude 4 Opus and Claude 3.5 Haiku. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureClaude 4 OpusClaude 3.5 Haiku
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$0.80/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$75.00/ 1M tokens
$4.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by Claude 4 Opus, Claude 3.5 Haiku, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
  • Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
  • Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
  • Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
  • Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
  • Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

  • Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
  • Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
  • Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

  • Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

    • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
    • GPT-4o
    • Many agent-driven systems
  • Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

  • Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
  • Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

  • Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
  • Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

  • High-volume, low-latency tasks
  • User-facing products
  • Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
  • Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
  • Rapid content or code generation where speed matters