Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonClaude 4.1 OpusClaude 3.5 Haiku

Claude 4.1 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude 3.5 Haiku. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureClaude 4.1 OpusClaude 3.5 Haiku
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$0.80/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$75.00/ 1M tokens
$4.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by Claude 4.1 Opus, Claude 3.5 Haiku, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

Claude 4.1 Opus

Anthropic

1. Advanced Coding Performance

  • Achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified, improving the Claude family's state-of-the-art coding abilities.

  • Stronger at:

    • Multi-file code refactoring
    • Large codebase debugging
    • Pinpointing exact corrections without unnecessary edits
  • Outperforms Opus 4 and shows gains comparable to jumps seen in past major releases.

2. Improved Agentic & Research Capabilities

  • Better at maintaining detail accuracy in long research tasks.
  • Enhanced agentic search and step-by-step problem solving.
  • Performs reliably across complex multi-turn reasoning tasks.

3. Validated by Real-World Users

  • GitHub: Better multi-file refactoring and code adjustments.
  • Rakuten Group: High precision debugging with minimal collateral changes.
  • Windsurf: One standard deviation improvement on their junior dev benchmark - similar magnitude to Sonnet 3.7 → Sonnet 4.

4. Hybrid-Reasoning Benchmark Improvements

  • Improvements across TAU-bench, GPQA Diamond, MMMLU, MMMU, AIME (with extended thinking).
  • Stronger robustness in long-context reasoning tasks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

  • Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
  • Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
  • Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

  • Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

    • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
    • GPT-4o
    • Many agent-driven systems
  • Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

  • Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
  • Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

  • Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
  • Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

  • High-volume, low-latency tasks
  • User-facing products
  • Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
  • Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
  • Rapid content or code generation where speed matters