Claude 4.7 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

• A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
• Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks — e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
• Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

• Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
• Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows — designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
• Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

• Takes instructions literally and precisely — existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
• More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

• Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) — over 3x more than prior Claude models.
• Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
• Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

• State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
• Strong on legal work — e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
• Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

• Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
• Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
• Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

• Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
• Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
• Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

• Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
  • GPT-4o
  • Many agent-driven systems

• Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

• Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
• Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

• Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
• Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

• High-volume, low-latency tasks
• User-facing products
• Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
• Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
• Rapid content or code generation where speed matters