Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGemini 3.1 ProClaude 4 Opus

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude 4 Opus

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Claude 4 Opus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 ProClaude 4 Opus
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window1,048,576 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$4.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$18.00/ 1M tokens
$75.00/ 1M tokens

Build AI powered apps

Create internal tools for your work that are powered by Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude 4 Opus, and other AI models. Just describe what you need and Appaca will create it for you.

Strengths & Best Use Cases

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

1. Google's most advanced reasoning Gemini model

  • Designed to solve complex problems across multimodal inputs, including text, audio, images, video, PDFs, and full code repositories.
  • Google highlights improved software engineering behavior, better agentic performance, and stronger usability in domains like finance and spreadsheets.

2. Large multimodal context with substantial output room

  • Supports a 1,048,576 token input context window for large repositories, long documents, and multi-source workflows.
  • Allows up to 65,536 output tokens for longer answers, plans, and code generations.

3. More efficient thinking with expanded controls

  • Improves token efficiency and reasoning performance across use cases.
  • Adds the MEDIUM thinking_level option to better balance cost, speed, and quality.

4. Strong support for production agents

  • Supports grounding with Google Search, code execution, function calling, structured outputs, context caching, RAG, and chat completions.
  • Also offers a custom-tools endpoint tuned for agentic workflows that mix bash-like tools with custom code tools.

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
  • Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
  • Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
  • Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
  • Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
  • Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.