GPT-4.1 vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

1. Smartest non-reasoning model

• Highest intelligence among models without a reasoning step.
• Great for tasks where speed + accuracy matter without deep chain-of-thought.

2. Excellent instruction following

• Very strong at structured tasks, formatting, and precise execution.
• Ideal for productized workflows and deterministic outputs.

3. Reliable tool calling

• Works smoothly with Web Search, File Search, Image Generation, and Code Interpreter.
• Supports MCP and advanced tool-enabled API flows.

4. Large 1M-token context window

• Allows extremely long conversations, large documents, and multi-file use cases.
• Handles context-heavy tasks without requiring chunking.

5. Low latency (no reasoning step)

• Faster responses than GPT-5 family when reasoning mode isn't required.
• More predictable timing for production use.

6. Multimodal input

• Accepts text + image.
• Output is text only.

7. Supports fine-tuning

• Can be fine-tuned for specialized tasks.
• Also supports distillation for smaller custom models.

1. Frontier-level coding at small-model speed

• Similar coding performance to Claude Sonnet 4 at one-third the cost.
• Runs 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5 for many tasks.
• Ideal for real-time pair programming, prototyping, and rapid iteration.

2. Excellent computer-use abilities

• Surpasses Claude Sonnet 4 in certain computer-control tasks.
• Great for agents requiring low-latency tool use (Chrome automation, coding agents, etc.).

3. Perfect for real-time, low-latency applications

• Chat assistants
• Customer support agents
• Interactive development loops
• Multi-agent orchestration

4. Works seamlessly with Sonnet 4.5 in hybrid agent setups

• Sonnet 4.5 plans complex workflows.
• Haiku 4.5 executes subtasks in parallel for speed and cost-efficiency.

5. High alignment & safest Claude model by metric

• Lower misaligned behavior rates than Haiku 3.5, Sonnet 4.5, and Opus 4.1.
• Limited CBRN risk → released under AI Safety Level 2 (ASL-2).