Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGPT-5 ProClaude 4 Opus

GPT-5 Pro vs Claude 4 Opus

Compare GPT-5 Pro and Claude 4 Opus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5 ProClaude 4 Opus
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$120.00/ 1M tokens
$75.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by GPT-5 Pro, Claude 4 Opus, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5 Pro

OpenAI

1. Highest reasoning quality in the GPT-5 family

  • Uses significantly more compute to "think harder" before responding.
  • Designed for the toughest reasoning tasks where answer quality matters more than speed.
  • Produces more precise, reliable, and detailed outputs than standard GPT-5.

2. Advanced multi-turn reasoning via Responses API

  • Available only in the Responses API to support:
    • Multi-turn internal model interactions before returning a reply.
    • Advanced control patterns (e.g., background mode for long-running jobs).
  • Ideal for complex workflows, deep planning, and multi-step analysis.

3. Configured for maximum effort by default

  • Always runs with reasoning.effort: 'high' (no lower-effort mode).
  • Prioritizes depth and correctness over latency and cost.

4. Multimodal input

  • Accepts text + image as input.
  • Outputs text, with strong instruction-following and analysis capabilities.

5. Tooling and ecosystem integration

  • Supports Web Search, File Search, and Image Generation (as tools).
  • Supports MCP and other Responses API tooling patterns.
  • Does not support Code Interpreter and does not support Computer Use, keeping focus on pure reasoning + tools.

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
  • Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
  • Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
  • Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
  • Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
  • Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.