GPT-5 vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

1. High reasoning capability

• Designed for intelligent reasoning across complex domains.
• Supports reasoning tokens and adjustable reasoning effort.

2. Strong coding and agentic performance

• Optimized for multi-step coding tasks, tool-use chains, and agent workflows.
• Handles complex logic, planning, and structured problem solving reliably.

3. Multimodal input

• Accepts text + image as input.
• Produces text outputs with strong instruction following.

4. Extensive tool support

• Works with Web Search, File Search, Image Generation (as a tool), Code Interpreter, MCP, and more.
• Integrated across Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime, Assistants, Batch, Embeddings, etc.

1. Frontier-level coding at small-model speed

• Similar coding performance to Claude Sonnet 4 at one-third the cost.
• Runs 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5 for many tasks.
• Ideal for real-time pair programming, prototyping, and rapid iteration.

2. Excellent computer-use abilities

• Surpasses Claude Sonnet 4 in certain computer-control tasks.
• Great for agents requiring low-latency tool use (Chrome automation, coding agents, etc.).

3. Perfect for real-time, low-latency applications

• Chat assistants
• Customer support agents
• Interactive development loops
• Multi-agent orchestration

4. Works seamlessly with Sonnet 4.5 in hybrid agent setups

• Sonnet 4.5 plans complex workflows.
• Haiku 4.5 executes subtasks in parallel for speed and cost-efficiency.

5. High alignment & safest Claude model by metric

• Lower misaligned behavior rates than Haiku 3.5, Sonnet 4.5, and Opus 4.1.
• Limited CBRN risk → released under AI Safety Level 2 (ASL-2).