Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonGPT-5.1 CodexClaude 4.5 Sonnet

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet

Compare GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude 4.5 Sonnet. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1 CodexClaude 4.5 Sonnet
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input Cost
$1.25/ 1M tokens
$3.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$10.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by GPT-5.1 Codex, Claude 4.5 Sonnet, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5.1 Codex

OpenAI

1. Purpose-Built for Agentic Coding

  • Designed specifically for environments where the model acts as an autonomous or semi-autonomous coding agent.
  • Optimized for multi-step reasoning in code tasks such as planning, refactoring, debugging, file generation, and tool coordination.

2. Enhanced Coding Intelligence

  • Extends GPT-5.1's advanced reasoning capabilities to handle complex software architecture decisions.
  • Better accuracy in code generation across languages (JavaScript, Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, etc.).
  • Produces cleaner, more idiomatic code aligned with modern frameworks and best practices.

3. Superior Tool Use & Code Navigation

  • Excels at reading, understanding, and transforming multi-file codebases.
  • Works well with Codex workflows that simulate real developer tooling.
  • Strong at following function signatures, constraints, and code patterns within an existing project.

4. Long-Range Context Awareness

  • 400,000-token context window enables the model to ingest large repositories or multiple files simultaneously.
  • Supports deep analysis of project structures, dependencies, and cross-file logic.

5. Multi-Modal Development Capabilities

  • Accepts text + image input and output - suitable for tasks like:
    • Reading UI mockups or screenshots to generate code
    • Understanding architectural diagrams
    • Reviewing images of whiteboard sessions

6. Agentic Workflow Optimization

  • Built to manage longer chains of thought and execution typically required in:
    • Automated code repair
    • Project bootstrapping
    • Linting and migration tasks
    • Long-running coding agents using planning + execution loops

7. Continually Updated Model Snapshot

  • Codex-specific version receives regular upgrades behind the scenes.
  • Ensures the latest coding improvements without requiring developers to update model names.

8. Reliable Instruction Following

  • Highly consistent in honoring explicit constraints:
    • Code styles
    • Folder structures
    • API contracts
    • Framework conventions

9. Broad API Support

  • Works across Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
  • Ideal for apps that need live, reasoning-heavy coding agents or generative dev environments.

Claude 4.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

1. Best-in-class coding performance

  • #1 on SWE-bench Verified (77.2% standard, 82.0% high-compute).
  • Excels at debugging, architecture, and multi-file code generation.
  • Maintains coherence for extremely long tasks (30+ hours).

2. State-of-the-art computer use & agents

  • Leads OSWorld at 61.4%.
  • Strongest model for agentic workflows, multi-step tool use, and real computer control.
  • Powering Claude Code, the new Claude Agent SDK, and Chrome agent actions.

3. Advanced reasoning & math

  • Large improvements across reasoning-heavy benchmarks (AIME, MMMLU, τ2-bench, Terminal-Bench).
  • Deep multi-step reasoning with extended or interleaved thinking.

4. High alignment & safety

  • Most aligned Claude model to date with reduced deception, hallucinations, sycophancy, and harmful compliance.
  • Strong protections against prompt injection for agentic tasks (ASL-3 safeguards).

5. Domain-expert performance

  • Notable gains in finance, law, medicine, and STEM tasks.
  • Trusted by early customers for long-context legal analysis, multi-file engineering, security research, and red-teaming.