LLM ComparisonGPT-5.1Claude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-5.1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Compare GPT-5.1 and Claude 3.5 Haiku. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1Claude 3.5 Haiku
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$1.25/ 1M tokens
$0.80/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$10.00/ 1M tokens
$4.00/ 1M tokens

Now in early access

You don't need SaaS anymore! Get a software exactly how you want it.

Appaca is the platform for personal software. Just describe what you need and get a ready-to-use app in minutes. Learn more

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5.1

OpenAI

1. Configurable Reasoning for Agentic Tasks

  • Built to excel in autonomous or semi-autonomous coding workflows, with adjustable reasoning effort for planning, refactoring and debugging.

2. Fast Multi-Modal Input with Large Output

  • Accepts both text and image inputs while producing text outputs.
  • Offers up to 128 k output tokens, allowing long responses and code generation across multiple files.

3. Large Context & Knowledge Cut-Off

  • 400 k token context window supports processing large codebases or documents.
  • Knowledge cut-off of Sep 30 2024 ensures familiarity with recent tools and frameworks.

4. Reasoning Token Support

  • Provides explicit support for reasoning tokens, enabling developers to fine-tune the balance between reasoning depth and speed.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

  • Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
  • Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
  • Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

  • Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

    • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
    • GPT-4o
    • Many agent-driven systems
  • Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

  • Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
  • Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

  • Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
  • Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

  • High-volume, low-latency tasks
  • User-facing products
  • Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
  • Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
  • Rapid content or code generation where speed matters

The platform for your ideal software

Use Appaca to to do the most with any software you need, just for your use case.