LLM ComparisonGPT-5.2 CodexQwen-Plus

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Qwen-Plus

Compare GPT-5.2 Codex and Qwen-Plus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 CodexQwen-Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba Cloud
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input Cost
$1.75/ 1M tokens
$0.12/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$14.00/ 1M tokens
$0.29/ 1M tokens

Now in early access

You don't need SaaS anymore! Get a software exactly how you want it.

Appaca is the platform for personal software. Just describe what you need and get a ready-to-use app in minutes. Learn more

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5.2 Codex

OpenAI

1. Optimized for Long-Horizon Coding Tasks

  • OpenAI describes GPT-5.2 Codex as a highly intelligent coding model built for long-horizon, agentic coding work.
  • Well suited to planning, refactoring, debugging, and multi-step implementation flows inside real codebases.

2. Adjustable Reasoning for Coding Work

  • Supports configurable reasoning effort from low to xhigh depending on speed and quality needs.
  • Accepts both text and image inputs while producing text output.

3. Large Context + Long Output

  • 400 k token context window supports broad repository understanding and larger working sets.
  • Allows up to 128 k output tokens for longer patches, code generation, and technical explanations.

4. Up-to-Date Model Snapshot

  • Knowledge cut-off of Aug 31 2025 keeps it current with newer tools and frameworks.
  • Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs for tool-driven coding workflows.

Qwen-Plus

Alibaba Cloud

1. Excellent balance of performance and cost

  • Faster and cheaper than Max but still powerful.

2. Optional thinking mode

  • Enhanced reasoning when needed.
  • Non-thinking mode is very fast and cheap.

3. Huge context window

  • Up to 1M tokens for long-document workflows.

4. Strong multilingual understanding

  • Supports 100+ languages.

The platform for your ideal software

Use Appaca to to do the most with any software you need, just for your use case.