Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM Comparisono1GPT-4o

o1 vs GPT-4o

Compare o1 and GPT-4o. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

Featureo1GPT-4o
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Model Typetexttext
Context Window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$2.50/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$60.00/ 1M tokens
$10.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by o1, GPT-4o, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

o1

OpenAI

1. Full-scale reasoning model

  • Uses reinforcement learning to generate long internal chains of thought.
  • Suitable for tasks requiring deep logic, multi-step planning, and rich analytical reasoning.

2. Strong performance across domains

  • Excellent at math, science, coding, and structured analytical work.
  • Handles multi-step workflows and complex problem-solving with high consistency.

3. High output capacity (100K tokens)

  • Enables long, detailed explanations, large documents, and multi-part analyses.

4. Image-understanding capable

  • Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning and mixed-modality tasks.
  • Output is text only, optimized for clear explanations.

5. Advanced API compatibility

  • Works with Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
  • Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs.

6. Stable long-context performance

  • 200K-token context window supports large files, multi-document analysis, and extended conversations.

7. Designed for correctness-oriented workloads

  • Prioritizes rigorous reasoning over speed.
  • Useful in auditing, verification, scientific thinking, policy analysis, and legal-style reasoning.

8. Powerful but expensive

  • High token costs make it suitable for selective, mission-critical reasoning rather than high-volume usage.

GPT-4o

OpenAI

1. High-intelligence, general-purpose model

  • Strong reasoning, creativity, summarization, and problem-solving.
  • Great balance of speed, accuracy, and cost.

2. Multimodal input support

  • Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning, extraction, or description.
  • Output is text only, making it predictable for production.

3. Excellent for structured and unstructured tasks

  • Performs well on Q&A, writing, analysis, classification, chat, and planning.
  • Supports Structured Outputs, making it suitable for deterministic workflows.

4. Strong tool-use capabilities

  • Supports function calling, API orchestration, and tool-augmented workflows.
  • Integrates well with assistants, batch operations, and automation pipelines.

5. Large context for complex tasks

  • 128K context allows multi-document reasoning, multi-step conversations, and large input payloads.

6. Production-ready reliability

  • Stable outputs, predictable behaviors, and broad modality coverage.
  • Supported across all major API endpoints.

7. Lower latency than o-series reasoning models

  • Faster responses due to no dedicated reasoning step.
  • Ideal for interactive or near-real-time applications.

8. Fine-tuning and distillation supported

  • Enables specialization for domain-specific tasks.
  • Distillation helps create smaller, efficient custom models.