Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM Comparisono1QVQ-Max

o1 vs QVQ-Max

Compare o1 and QVQ-Max. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

Featureo1QVQ-Max
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba Cloud
Model Typetextvision
Context Window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$1.15/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$60.00/ 1M tokens
$4.59/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by o1, QVQ-Max, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

o1

OpenAI

1. Full-scale reasoning model

  • Uses reinforcement learning to generate long internal chains of thought.
  • Suitable for tasks requiring deep logic, multi-step planning, and rich analytical reasoning.

2. Strong performance across domains

  • Excellent at math, science, coding, and structured analytical work.
  • Handles multi-step workflows and complex problem-solving with high consistency.

3. High output capacity (100K tokens)

  • Enables long, detailed explanations, large documents, and multi-part analyses.

4. Image-understanding capable

  • Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning and mixed-modality tasks.
  • Output is text only, optimized for clear explanations.

5. Advanced API compatibility

  • Works with Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
  • Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs.

6. Stable long-context performance

  • 200K-token context window supports large files, multi-document analysis, and extended conversations.

7. Designed for correctness-oriented workloads

  • Prioritizes rigorous reasoning over speed.
  • Useful in auditing, verification, scientific thinking, policy analysis, and legal-style reasoning.

8. Powerful but expensive

  • High token costs make it suitable for selective, mission-critical reasoning rather than high-volume usage.

QVQ-Max

Alibaba Cloud

1. Strongest visual reasoning in Qwen lineup

  • Handles charts, diagrams, puzzles.

2. Great for math + vision hybrids

  • Geometry, visual logic testing.

3. High-quality instruction following

  • Consistent formatting and detailed responses.