Build AI powered apps for your work

Get started free
LLM ComparisonClaude 4.1 OpusClaude 4 Opus

Claude 4.1 Opus vs Claude 4 Opus

Compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude 4 Opus. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureClaude 4.1 OpusClaude 4 Opus
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$15.00/ 1M tokens
$15.00/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$75.00/ 1M tokens
$75.00/ 1M tokens

Stop choosing. Use both.

With Appaca you don't have to pick — build apps that are powered by Claude 4.1 Opus, Claude 4 Opus, for your specific use case.

Build your first app free

Strengths & Best Use Cases

Claude 4.1 Opus

Anthropic

1. Advanced Coding Performance

  • Achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified, improving the Claude family's state-of-the-art coding abilities.

  • Stronger at:

    • Multi-file code refactoring
    • Large codebase debugging
    • Pinpointing exact corrections without unnecessary edits
  • Outperforms Opus 4 and shows gains comparable to jumps seen in past major releases.

2. Improved Agentic & Research Capabilities

  • Better at maintaining detail accuracy in long research tasks.
  • Enhanced agentic search and step-by-step problem solving.
  • Performs reliably across complex multi-turn reasoning tasks.

3. Validated by Real-World Users

  • GitHub: Better multi-file refactoring and code adjustments.
  • Rakuten Group: High precision debugging with minimal collateral changes.
  • Windsurf: One standard deviation improvement on their junior dev benchmark - similar magnitude to Sonnet 3.7 → Sonnet 4.

4. Hybrid-Reasoning Benchmark Improvements

  • Improvements across TAU-bench, GPQA Diamond, MMMLU, MMMU, AIME (with extended thinking).
  • Stronger robustness in long-context reasoning tasks.

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
  • Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
  • Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
  • Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
  • Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
  • Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.