GPT-4o Audio vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

1. True multimodal audio model

• Accepts raw audio as input and produces audio or text as output.
• Enables hands-free, voice-first app experiences.

2. Natural real-time speech interaction

• Low-latency audio generation suitable for conversational agents.
• Great for voice assistants, phone bots, and interactive voice UI.

3. Large 128K context window

• Supports long conversations, call transcripts, instructions, or multi-part interactions.
• Ideal for building persistent voice agents or phone workflows.

4. High-output capacity

• Up to 16,384 max output tokens for extended responses or long explanations.
• Suitable for complex reasoning tasks in voice format.

5. Hybrid text + audio workloads

• Combine audio input/output with text prompts, instructions, or structured control.
• Useful for customer support bots, spoken form systems, IVR replacements, etc.

6. Compatible with the latest APIs

• Works with Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime API, and Assistants.
• Supports streaming, function calling, and advanced developer tooling.

7. Strong performance for a preview model

• High reasoning and expression abilities relative to most audio-capable models.
• Designed for production-style experimentation prior to full release.

8. Ideal for next-gen voice applications

• Build lifelike AI agents, interview bots, tutoring systems, and spoken knowledge tools.
• Perfect for startups building audio-first user experiences.

1. Intelligence & Reasoning

• Outperforms previous Claude models and competitor LLMs across major benchmarks.
• Excels in graduate-level reasoning (GPQA), knowledge tasks (MMLU), and coding (HumanEval).
• Handles nuance, humor, and complex instructions with human-like clarity.

2. Speed & Efficiency

• Runs 2x faster than Claude 3 Opus, making it ideal for real-time and high-volume workflows.
• Cost-effective pricing: $3/M input tokens and $15/M output tokens.
• Supports a 200K token context window, enabling rich, long-form reasoning.

3. Coding Capabilities

• Solves significantly more coding and bug-fix tasks (64% vs Opus's 38% in internal evaluations).
• Can autonomously write, edit, and execute code when tool use is enabled.
• Strong at translating and modernizing legacy codebases.

4. Vision Strength

• Best vision model in the Claude family, surpassing Opus on vision benchmarks.
• Excellent at interpreting charts, graphs, and imperfect images.
• Reliable text extraction from low-quality visuals for retail, logistics, finance, etc.

5. Agentic Workflows

• Highly capable for multi-step task orchestration.
• Performs well as the engine for agents requiring reasoning, planning, and tool-calling abilities.

6. Content Quality

• Produces natural, relatable writing with improved tone, style, and context awareness.
• Strong at long-form content creation and editing.

7. Safety & Reliability

• Rated ASL-2, meeting Anthropic's safety standards.
• Undergoes extensive red-teaming and external evaluation (UK AISI & US AISI).
• Not trained on user data without explicit permission.