GPT-5 Mini vs Claude 4.5 Haiku

1. High reasoning performance

• Retains strong reasoning capabilities despite being a smaller, faster model.
• Suitable for tasks requiring accurate logic and structured thinking.

2. Fast and cost-efficient

• Optimized for speed, making it ideal for real-time or high-volume workloads.
• Far cheaper than GPT-5 while maintaining solid capability.

3. Great for well-defined tasks

• Excels when prompts are precise and objectives are clearly specified.
• More predictable and stable for deterministic workflows.

4. Multimodal input

• Accepts text + image as input.
• Outputs text only.

5. Tool support

• Works with Web Search, File Search, Code Interpreter, MCP.
• (Does not support Image Generation as a tool and does not support Computer Use.)

1. Frontier-level coding at small-model speed

• Similar coding performance to Claude Sonnet 4 at one-third the cost.
• Runs 4-5x faster than Sonnet 4.5 for many tasks.
• Ideal for real-time pair programming, prototyping, and rapid iteration.

2. Excellent computer-use abilities

• Surpasses Claude Sonnet 4 in certain computer-control tasks.
• Great for agents requiring low-latency tool use (Chrome automation, coding agents, etc.).

3. Perfect for real-time, low-latency applications

• Chat assistants
• Customer support agents
• Interactive development loops
• Multi-agent orchestration

4. Works seamlessly with Sonnet 4.5 in hybrid agent setups

• Sonnet 4.5 plans complex workflows.
• Haiku 4.5 executes subtasks in parallel for speed and cost-efficiency.

5. High alignment & safest Claude model by metric

• Lower misaligned behavior rates than Haiku 3.5, Sonnet 4.5, and Opus 4.1.
• Limited CBRN risk → released under AI Safety Level 2 (ASL-2).