o1-pro vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

1. Maximum-compute o-series model

• Uses significantly more compute per query compared to o1.
• Produces deeper, more reliable reasoning chains.
• Best suited for high-stakes tasks that need correctness over speed.

2. Trained with reinforcement learning for deliberate thinking

• Explicit "think-before-answer" architecture.
• Excels at complex reasoning requiring multi-step analysis.

3. Very strong at math, science, coding, and technical proofs

• Handles long derivations, algorithm design, and difficult logic problems.
• Produces structured and explainable reasoning trails.

4. Great for multi-turn reasoning workflows

• Responses API optimized: can think over multiple internal turns before responding.
• Ideal for agentic reasoning pipelines.

5. Large context window

• 200,000-token context for large documents, multi-file review, and long reasoning traces.

6. Multimodal input (text + image)

• Can analyze images for mathematical diagrams, charts, handwritten content, UI layouts, etc.
• Output is text only.

7. Consistency, reliability, and depth

• Designed for situations where accuracy matters more than latency or cost.
• Strong error-checking and self-correction abilities.

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

• Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
• Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
• Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

• Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
  • GPT-4o
  • Many agent-driven systems

• Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

• Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
• Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

• Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
• Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

• High-volume, low-latency tasks
• User-facing products
• Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
• Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
• Rapid content or code generation where speed matters