o1-pro vs Qwen-Turbo

1. Maximum-compute o-series model

• Uses significantly more compute per query compared to o1.
• Produces deeper, more reliable reasoning chains.
• Best suited for high-stakes tasks that need correctness over speed.

2. Trained with reinforcement learning for deliberate thinking

• Explicit "think-before-answer" architecture.
• Excels at complex reasoning requiring multi-step analysis.

3. Very strong at math, science, coding, and technical proofs

• Handles long derivations, algorithm design, and difficult logic problems.
• Produces structured and explainable reasoning trails.

4. Great for multi-turn reasoning workflows

• Responses API optimized: can think over multiple internal turns before responding.
• Ideal for agentic reasoning pipelines.

5. Large context window

• 200,000-token context for large documents, multi-file review, and long reasoning traces.

6. Multimodal input (text + image)

• Can analyze images for mathematical diagrams, charts, handwritten content, UI layouts, etc.
• Output is text only.

7. Consistency, reliability, and depth

• Designed for situations where accuracy matters more than latency or cost.
• Strong error-checking and self-correction abilities.

1. Fast and affordable

• Good for standard LLM workloads.

2. Supports thinking mode

• Allows moderate reasoning.

3. Being replaced by Qwen-Flash

• Flash has better pricing and performance.