o1 vs Claude 4 Opus

1. Full-scale reasoning model

• Uses reinforcement learning to generate long internal chains of thought.
• Suitable for tasks requiring deep logic, multi-step planning, and rich analytical reasoning.

2. Strong performance across domains

• Excellent at math, science, coding, and structured analytical work.
• Handles multi-step workflows and complex problem-solving with high consistency.

3. High output capacity (100K tokens)

• Enables long, detailed explanations, large documents, and multi-part analyses.

4. Image-understanding capable

• Accepts text + image inputs for visual reasoning and mixed-modality tasks.
• Output is text only, optimized for clear explanations.

5. Advanced API compatibility

• Works with Chat Completions, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
• Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs.

6. Stable long-context performance

• 200K-token context window supports large files, multi-document analysis, and extended conversations.

7. Designed for correctness-oriented workloads

• Prioritizes rigorous reasoning over speed.
• Useful in auditing, verification, scientific thinking, policy analysis, and legal-style reasoning.

8. Powerful but expensive

• High token costs make it suitable for selective, mission-critical reasoning rather than high-volume usage.

• Highest capability in the family: described as “our most powerful model yet” by Anthropic.
• Exceptional at long-running tasks requiring thousands of steps and sustained focus (e.g., continuous codebase work for hours).
• Excellent performance on benchmarks: e.g., SWE-bench 72.5 % and Terminal-bench 43.2 %.
• Designed for complex agentic workflows, deep reasoning, tool use, and large context windows.
• Placed under a higher safety classification (ASL-3) due to its frontier capability and risk profile.