VS

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-4 Turbo by OpenAI and Claude 4.1 Opus by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

GPT-4 Turbo

Older high-intelligence GPT-4 generation model offering strong reasoning and image input support, now superseded by newer 4o-based models.

View GPT-4 Turbo
text

Claude 4.1 Opus

A refined flagship model with improved coding, reasoning, research depth, and agentic task performance over Opus 4.

View Claude 4.1 Opus

GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 4.1 Opus at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec GPT-4 Turbo Claude 4.1 Opus
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Model type Text Text
Context window 128K tokens 1M tokens
Input price $10 / 1M tokens $15 / 1M tokens
Output price $30 / 1M tokens $75 / 1M tokens
Status Current Superseded by Claude 4.5 Opus
Key differences

How GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 4.1 Opus differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 4.1 Opus.

  • GPT-4 Turbo is 33% cheaper on input tokens ($10 vs $15 per million), which adds up quickly in document-heavy workloads.

  • GPT-4 Turbo is 60% cheaper on output tokens ($30 vs $75 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.

  • Claude 4.1 Opus's 1M tokens context window is roughly 7.8x larger than GPT-4 Turbo's 128K tokens, so it can work across bigger codebases, contracts, or archives in one pass.

  • Claude 4.1 Opus has been superseded by Claude 4.5 Opus - for new builds, consider the newer model first.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

GPT-4 Turbo

1. Strong reasoning for its generation

  • Next-gen version of GPT-4 designed to be cheaper and faster than the original.
  • Good for analytical tasks, structured writing, coding guidance, and multi-step reasoning.

2. Image input support

  • Accepts images and provides text-only outputs.
  • Useful for OCR, visual Q&A, document extraction, UI analysis, and design interpretation.

3. Stable performance

  • Predictable model behavior suitable for legacy systems still built on GPT-4.
  • Works reliably for established pipelines and enterprise workloads.

4. Large 128K context window

  • Handles long documents, multi-file inputs, or extended conversational sessions.
  • Allows complex prompt chaining and large instruction sets.

5. Broad endpoint compatibility

  • Works with Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime API, Assistants, Batch, Fine-tuning, Embeddings, and more.
  • Supports streaming and function calling.

6. Good choice for cost-controlled GPT-4-class workloads

  • Although older, still useful for teams who want GPT-4-level reasoning without upgrading immediately.
  • A midpoint between legacy GPT-4 and modern GPT-4o/5.1 models.

7. Text-only output simplifies downstream use

  • Ensures deterministic outputs for applications that need reliable text generation.
  • Good for RAG, data pipelines, automation tools, and enterprise systems.

8. Recommended migration path

  • OpenAI now recommends using GPT-4o or GPT-5.1 for improved speed, cost, reasoning, and multimodal capability.
  • GPT-4 Turbo remains available for backward compatibility and stability.

Claude 4.1 Opus

1. Advanced Coding Performance

  • Achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified, improving the Claude family's state-of-the-art coding abilities.

  • Stronger at:

    • Multi-file code refactoring
    • Large codebase debugging
    • Pinpointing exact corrections without unnecessary edits
  • Outperforms Opus 4 and shows gains comparable to jumps seen in past major releases.

2. Improved Agentic & Research Capabilities

  • Better at maintaining detail accuracy in long research tasks.
  • Enhanced agentic search and step-by-step problem solving.
  • Performs reliably across complex multi-turn reasoning tasks.

3. Validated by Real-World Users

  • GitHub: Better multi-file refactoring and code adjustments.
  • Rakuten Group: High precision debugging with minimal collateral changes.
  • Windsurf: One standard deviation improvement on their junior dev benchmark - similar magnitude to Sonnet 3.7 → Sonnet 4.

4. Hybrid-Reasoning Benchmark Improvements

  • Improvements across TAU-bench, GPQA Diamond, MMMLU, MMMU, AIME (with extended thinking).
  • Stronger robustness in long-context reasoning tasks.
Appaca

Use GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on GPT-4 Turbo, test the same tool on Claude 4.1 Opus, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than Claude 4.1 Opus?

GPT-4 Turbo is generally cheaper: $10 input / $30 output per million tokens, versus $15 / $75 for Claude 4.1 Opus. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus?

Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared to 128K tokens for GPT-4 Turbo. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.

Should I use GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on GPT-4 Turbo, test the same tool on Claude 4.1 Opus, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 4.1 Opus without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-4 Turbo, Claude 4.1 Opus, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with GPT-4 Turbo or Claude 4.1 Opus

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.