VS

GPT-5.4 vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-5.4 by OpenAI and Claude 4.7 Opus by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

GPT-5.4

OpenAI's frontier model for complex professional work with best intelligence at scale for agentic, coding, and professional workflows.

View GPT-5.4
text

Claude 4.7 Opus

Anthropic's latest frontier Opus model, purpose-built for advanced software engineering, long-horizon agent work, and high-resolution multimodal reasoning.

View Claude 4.7 Opus

GPT-5.4 vs Claude 4.7 Opus at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec GPT-5.4 Claude 4.7 Opus
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Model type Text Text
Context window 1.05M tokens 1M tokens
Input price $2.5 / 1M tokens $5 / 1M tokens
Output price $15 / 1M tokens $25 / 1M tokens
Status Current Current
Key differences

How GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.7 Opus differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.7 Opus.

  • GPT-5.4 is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($2.5 vs $5 per million), which adds up quickly in document-heavy workloads.

  • GPT-5.4 is 40% cheaper on output tokens ($15 vs $25 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.

  • Context windows are close: GPT-5.4 handles 1.05M tokens and Claude 4.7 Opus handles 1M tokens.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

GPT-5.4

1. Best Intelligence at Scale

  • OpenAI positions GPT-5.4 as its frontier model for agentic, coding, and professional workflows.
  • Built for complex professional work where stronger reasoning and higher answer quality matter.

2. Configurable Reasoning + Multimodal Input

  • Supports configurable reasoning effort from none to xhigh, letting teams balance speed and depth.
  • Accepts both text and image inputs while producing text output.

3. Massive Context for Long-Running Work

  • 1.05M token context window supports very large codebases, documents, and multi-step workflows.
  • Allows up to 128 k output tokens for long-form answers and larger generations.

4. Updated Knowledge & Broad Tool Support

  • Knowledge cut-off of Aug 31 2025 keeps it current for newer frameworks and business context.
  • Supports tools like web search, file search, code interpreter, hosted shell, computer use, and MCP in the Responses API.

Claude 4.7 Opus

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

  • A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
  • Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks - e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
  • Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

  • Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
  • Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows - designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
  • Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

  • Takes instructions literally and precisely - existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
  • More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

  • Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) - over 3x more than prior Claude models.
  • Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
  • Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

  • State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
  • Strong on legal work - e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
  • Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

  • Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
  • Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
  • Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.
Appaca

Use GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on GPT-5.4, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is GPT-5.4 cheaper than Claude 4.7 Opus?

GPT-5.4 is generally cheaper: $2.5 input / $15 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $25 for Claude 4.7 Opus. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus?

GPT-5.4 has the larger context window at 1.05M tokens, compared to 1M tokens for Claude 4.7 Opus. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.

Should I use GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on GPT-5.4, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use GPT-5.4 and Claude 4.7 Opus without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-5.4, Claude 4.7 Opus, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with GPT-5.4 or Claude 4.7 Opus

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.