GPT-5.5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus
Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-5.5 by OpenAI and Claude 4.7 Opus by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.
GPT-5.5
OpenAI's smartest and most capable model yet for agentic coding, knowledge work, and computer use, delivering a new class of intelligence at GPT-5.4 latency.
View GPT-5.5Claude 4.7 Opus
Anthropic's latest frontier Opus model, purpose-built for advanced software engineering, long-horizon agent work, and high-resolution multimodal reasoning.
View Claude 4.7 OpusGPT-5.5 vs Claude 4.7 Opus at a glance
Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.
| Spec | GPT-5.5 | Claude 4.7 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Model type | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Input price | $5 / 1M tokens | $5 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $30 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens |
| Status | Current | Current |
How GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.7 Opus differ
What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.7 Opus.
Our take
Both are frontier reasoning models with 1M-token context windows and near-identical input pricing. GPT-5.5 leads on agentic coding and computer-use benchmarks, while Claude 4.7 Opus is the favourite for careful long-document analysis and dependable business writing. For most teams the deciding factor is output cost (Claude is slightly cheaper per output token) and tone of writing - and in Appaca you can run a tool on either and switch later without rebuilding.
-
GPT-5.5 posts state-of-the-art agentic coding scores (Terminal-Bench 2.0, SWE-Bench Pro), making it the stronger pick for code-heavy automations.
-
Claude 4.7 Opus is widely preferred for drafting reports, proposals, and policy documents where measured, careful prose matters.
-
Both handle ~1M tokens of context, so either can work across entire codebases or months of records in one pass.
-
Both models cost the same on input: $5 per million tokens.
-
Claude 4.7 Opus is 17% cheaper on output tokens ($25 vs $30 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.
-
Both models offer the same 1M tokens context window.
Strengths side by side
Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.
GPT-5.5
1. Strongest Agentic Coding Model
- State-of-the-art on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (82.7%), Expert-SWE (73.1%), and SWE-Bench Pro (58.6%), outperforming GPT-5.4 on complex coding tasks.
- Holds context across large systems, reasons through ambiguous failures, and carries changes through surrounding codebases with fewer tokens.
2. Higher Intelligence at GPT-5.4 Latency
- Co-designed, trained, and served on NVIDIA GB200/GB300 NVL72 systems to match GPT-5.4 per-token latency while performing at a significantly higher level.
- Uses fewer tokens to complete the same tasks, making it more efficient as well as more capable.
3. Powerful for Knowledge Work & Computer Use
- Scores 84.9% on GDPval (44 occupations) and 78.7% on OSWorld-Verified for autonomous computer operation.
- Excels at generating documents, spreadsheets, and reports; naturally moves across finding information, using tools, and checking output.
4. Scientific Research Co-Scientist
- Leading performance on GeneBench, BixBench, and FrontierMath; helped discover a new proof about Ramsey numbers verified in Lean.
- Strong enough to meaningfully accelerate progress at the frontiers of biomedical and mathematical research.
Claude 4.7 Opus
1. State-of-the-art software engineering
- A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
- Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks - e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
- Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.
2. Long-horizon agent reliability
- Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
- Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows - designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
- Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.
3. Sharper instruction following and honesty
- Takes instructions literally and precisely - existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
- More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.
4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning
- Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) - over 3x more than prior Claude models.
- Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
- Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).
5. Top-tier professional knowledge work
- State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
- Strong on legal work - e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
- Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.
6. Modern effort and budget controls
- Introduces a new
xhigheffort level betweenhighandmaxfor finer control over reasoning vs. latency. - Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
- Recommended to start with
highorxhigheffort for coding and agentic use cases.
Use GPT-5.5 or Claude 4.7 Opus - or both
Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.
Describe it, and it's built
Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 4.7 Opus. No code, no API keys, no deployment.
Switch models without rebuilding
Start on GPT-5.5, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.
Automated for the whole team
Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.
Describe it, and it's built
Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to the tools you already use.







Related comparisons
See how GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.7 Opus stack up against other models in the directory.
FAQs
Claude 4.7 Opus is generally cheaper: $5 input / $25 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $30 for GPT-5.5. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.
They are equal: both GPT-5.5 and Claude 4.7 Opus support a 1M tokens context window.
Both are frontier reasoning models with 1M-token context windows and near-identical input pricing. GPT-5.5 leads on agentic coding and computer-use benchmarks, while Claude 4.7 Opus is the favourite for careful long-document analysis and dependable business writing. For most teams the deciding factor is output cost (Claude is slightly cheaper per output token) and tone of writing - and in Appaca you can run a tool on either and switch later without rebuilding.
Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-5.5, Claude 4.7 Opus, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.
Build AI tools with GPT-5.5 or Claude 4.7 Opus
Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.