VS

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-5.1 Codex by OpenAI and Claude 4.7 Opus by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

GPT-5.1 Codex

Version of GPT-5.1 optimized for agentic coding inside Codex and similar environments, with strong reasoning and multimodal support.

View GPT-5.1 Codex
text

Claude 4.7 Opus

Anthropic's latest frontier Opus model, purpose-built for advanced software engineering, long-horizon agent work, and high-resolution multimodal reasoning.

View Claude 4.7 Opus

GPT-5.1 Codex vs Claude 4.7 Opus at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec GPT-5.1 Codex Claude 4.7 Opus
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Model type Text Text
Context window 400K tokens 1M tokens
Input price $1.25 / 1M tokens $5 / 1M tokens
Output price $10 / 1M tokens $25 / 1M tokens
Status Superseded by GPT-5.2 Codex Current
Key differences

How GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude 4.7 Opus differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude 4.7 Opus.

  • GPT-5.1 Codex is 75% cheaper on input tokens ($1.25 vs $5 per million), which adds up quickly in document-heavy workloads.

  • GPT-5.1 Codex is 60% cheaper on output tokens ($10 vs $25 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.

  • Claude 4.7 Opus's 1M tokens context window is roughly 2.5x larger than GPT-5.1 Codex's 400K tokens, so it can work across bigger codebases, contracts, or archives in one pass.

  • GPT-5.1 Codex has been superseded by GPT-5.2 Codex - for new builds, consider the newer model first.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

GPT-5.1 Codex

1. Purpose-Built for Agentic Coding

  • Designed specifically for environments where the model acts as an autonomous or semi-autonomous coding agent.
  • Optimized for multi-step reasoning in code tasks such as planning, refactoring, debugging, file generation, and tool coordination.

2. Enhanced Coding Intelligence

  • Extends GPT-5.1's advanced reasoning capabilities to handle complex software architecture decisions.
  • Better accuracy in code generation across languages (JavaScript, Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, etc.).
  • Produces cleaner, more idiomatic code aligned with modern frameworks and best practices.

3. Superior Tool Use & Code Navigation

  • Excels at reading, understanding, and transforming multi-file codebases.
  • Works well with Codex workflows that simulate real developer tooling.
  • Strong at following function signatures, constraints, and code patterns within an existing project.

4. Long-Range Context Awareness

  • 400,000-token context window enables the model to ingest large repositories or multiple files simultaneously.
  • Supports deep analysis of project structures, dependencies, and cross-file logic.

5. Multi-Modal Development Capabilities

  • Accepts text + image input and output - suitable for tasks like:
    • Reading UI mockups or screenshots to generate code
    • Understanding architectural diagrams
    • Reviewing images of whiteboard sessions

6. Agentic Workflow Optimization

  • Built to manage longer chains of thought and execution typically required in:
    • Automated code repair
    • Project bootstrapping
    • Linting and migration tasks
    • Long-running coding agents using planning + execution loops

7. Continually Updated Model Snapshot

  • Codex-specific version receives regular upgrades behind the scenes.
  • Ensures the latest coding improvements without requiring developers to update model names.

8. Reliable Instruction Following

  • Highly consistent in honoring explicit constraints:
    • Code styles
    • Folder structures
    • API contracts
    • Framework conventions

9. Broad API Support

  • Works across Chat Completions, Responses API, Realtime, Assistants, and more.
  • Ideal for apps that need live, reasoning-heavy coding agents or generative dev environments.

Claude 4.7 Opus

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

  • A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
  • Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks - e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
  • Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

  • Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
  • Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows - designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
  • Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

  • Takes instructions literally and precisely - existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
  • More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

  • Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) - over 3x more than prior Claude models.
  • Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
  • Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

  • State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
  • Strong on legal work - e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
  • Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

  • Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
  • Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
  • Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.
Appaca

Use GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on GPT-5.1 Codex, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is GPT-5.1 Codex cheaper than Claude 4.7 Opus?

GPT-5.1 Codex is generally cheaper: $1.25 input / $10 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $25 for Claude 4.7 Opus. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus?

Claude 4.7 Opus has the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared to 400K tokens for GPT-5.1 Codex. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.

Should I use GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on GPT-5.1 Codex, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use GPT-5.1 Codex and Claude 4.7 Opus without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-5.1 Codex, Claude 4.7 Opus, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with GPT-5.1 Codex or Claude 4.7 Opus

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.