Workable vs Greenhouse

Workable and Greenhouse are both strong ATS platforms but serve different points on the company growth curve. Workable is the fastest ATS to get running - transparent pricing, great job board syndication, and minimal training required. Greenhouse is the platform of choice for high-growth companies that need structured hiring at scale with deep analytics.

Build a custom alternative free

Side-by-side

Accessible ATS for SMB and mid-market hiring vs Enterprise applicant tracking and recruiting platform.

FeatureWorkableGreenhouse
Pricing from$149/monthCustom pricing
Time to first job postSame dayDays to weeks
Pricing modelTransparent - per month tiersCustom contract
Interview scorecardsGoodBest-in-class
Diversity and bias reductionBasic featuresAdvanced
Best forSMBs and companies making first 10-100 hiresHigh-growth companies with 50+ hires/year
Analytics depthModerateAdvanced

The third option most teams miss

Picking between Workable and Greenhouse isn't the only choice.

For companies that need to track candidates and pipeline stages in a custom format without paying Greenhouse prices, Appaca builds a tailored hiring tracker fast.

  • No code, no deployment, no devops
  • Built-in database, dashboards, team access
  • Refine with chat as your needs change
  • Free to start, no per-seat pricing surprises

Common questions

Should I use Workable or Greenhouse?

For companies making their first 50-100 hires annually, Workable is faster and cheaper to start. As hiring volume increases and process sophistication matters more, Greenhouse becomes worth the investment.

How does Appaca fit into this comparison?

Appaca is a third option for teams that don't want to choose between two existing tools. Instead of forcing your workflow into someone else's product, Appaca builds a custom app from a description - with built-in database, hosting, and team access. Try it free at appaca.ai.