LLM ComparisonGPT-5.2 CodexClaude 3.5 Haiku

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

Compare GPT-5.2 Codex and Claude 3.5 Haiku. Build AI products powered by either model on Appaca.

Model Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.2 CodexClaude 3.5 Haiku
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Model Typetexttext
Context Window400,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Input Cost
$1.75/ 1M tokens
$0.80/ 1M tokens
Output Cost
$14.00/ 1M tokens
$4.00/ 1M tokens

Now in early access

You don't need SaaS anymore! Get a software exactly how you want it.

Appaca is the platform for personal software. Just describe what you need and get a ready-to-use app in minutes. Learn more

Strengths & Best Use Cases

GPT-5.2 Codex

OpenAI

1. Optimized for Long-Horizon Coding Tasks

  • OpenAI describes GPT-5.2 Codex as a highly intelligent coding model built for long-horizon, agentic coding work.
  • Well suited to planning, refactoring, debugging, and multi-step implementation flows inside real codebases.

2. Adjustable Reasoning for Coding Work

  • Supports configurable reasoning effort from low to xhigh depending on speed and quality needs.
  • Accepts both text and image inputs while producing text output.

3. Large Context + Long Output

  • 400 k token context window supports broad repository understanding and larger working sets.
  • Allows up to 128 k output tokens for longer patches, code generation, and technical explanations.

4. Up-to-Date Model Snapshot

  • Knowledge cut-off of Aug 31 2025 keeps it current with newer tools and frameworks.
  • Supports streaming, function calling, and structured outputs for tool-driven coding workflows.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance

  • Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
  • Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
  • Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.

2. Coding Strength

  • Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:

    • Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
    • GPT-4o
    • Many agent-driven systems
  • Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.

3. Speed & Latency

  • Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
  • Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.

4. Tool Use & Instruction Following

  • Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
  • Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.

5. Best Use Cases

  • High-volume, low-latency tasks
  • User-facing products
  • Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
  • Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
  • Rapid content or code generation where speed matters

The platform for your ideal software

Use Appaca to to do the most with any software you need, just for your use case.