VS

GPT-5.5 vs Claude 5 Sonnet

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-5.5 by OpenAI and Claude 5 Sonnet by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

GPT-5.5

OpenAI's smartest and most capable model yet for agentic coding, knowledge work, and computer use, delivering a new class of intelligence at GPT-5.4 latency.

View GPT-5.5
text

Claude 5 Sonnet

Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet yet, closing much of the gap to Opus 4.8 on reasoning, coding, and tool use while staying at Sonnet's speed and price.

View Claude 5 Sonnet

GPT-5.5 vs Claude 5 Sonnet at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec GPT-5.5 Claude 5 Sonnet
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Model type Text Text
Context window 1M tokens 1M tokens
Input price $5 / 1M tokens $3 / 1M tokens
Output price $30 / 1M tokens $15 / 1M tokens
Status Current Current
Key differences

How GPT-5.5 and Claude 5 Sonnet differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-5.5 and Claude 5 Sonnet.

  • Claude 5 Sonnet is 40% cheaper on input tokens ($3 vs $5 per million), which adds up quickly in document-heavy workloads.

  • Claude 5 Sonnet is 50% cheaper on output tokens ($15 vs $30 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.

  • Both models offer the same 1M tokens context window.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

GPT-5.5

1. Strongest Agentic Coding Model

  • State-of-the-art on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (82.7%), Expert-SWE (73.1%), and SWE-Bench Pro (58.6%), outperforming GPT-5.4 on complex coding tasks.
  • Holds context across large systems, reasons through ambiguous failures, and carries changes through surrounding codebases with fewer tokens.

2. Higher Intelligence at GPT-5.4 Latency

  • Co-designed, trained, and served on NVIDIA GB200/GB300 NVL72 systems to match GPT-5.4 per-token latency while performing at a significantly higher level.
  • Uses fewer tokens to complete the same tasks, making it more efficient as well as more capable.

3. Powerful for Knowledge Work & Computer Use

  • Scores 84.9% on GDPval (44 occupations) and 78.7% on OSWorld-Verified for autonomous computer operation.
  • Excels at generating documents, spreadsheets, and reports; naturally moves across finding information, using tools, and checking output.

4. Scientific Research Co-Scientist

  • Leading performance on GeneBench, BixBench, and FrontierMath; helped discover a new proof about Ramsey numbers verified in Lean.
  • Strong enough to meaningfully accelerate progress at the frontiers of biomedical and mathematical research.

Claude 5 Sonnet

1. Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet yet

  • A substantial upgrade over Sonnet 4.6 on reasoning, tool use, coding, and knowledge work - narrows the gap to Opus 4.8 while staying at Sonnet pricing.
  • Early partners describe it finishing multi-step jobs end to end where prior Sonnet models used to stall halfway.

2. Clear benchmark gains over Sonnet 4.6

  • 63.2% on SWE-bench Pro (vs 58.1%), 80.4% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (vs 67.0%), 81.2% on OSWorld-Verified (vs 78.5%), and 57.4% on Humanity's Last Exam with tools (vs 46.8%).
  • On the GDPval-AA v2 knowledge-work benchmark it edges past Opus 4.8 (1,618 vs 1,615).

3. Near-Opus performance at a fraction of the price

  • Priced at $3/M input and $15/M output - 40% cheaper than Opus 4.8's $5/$25 - with introductory pricing of $2/$10 through Aug 31, 2026 during the rollout.
  • Supports low, medium, high, and xhigh effort levels, covering a wider cost-performance range than Sonnet 4.6 and matching Opus 4.8 on some tasks at higher effort.

4. Long-context, long-horizon reliability

  • Full 1M token context window with up to 128K output tokens.
  • Adaptive thinking automatically decides how long to reason; better self-correction, fewer tool errors, and steadier follow-through across long agent sessions in Claude Code and Cowork.

5. Safer and more honest than its predecessor

  • Lower rates of hallucination, sycophancy, and misaligned behavior than Sonnet 4.6 on Anthropic's automated safety audits.
  • Deliberately limited cyber capability compared with Opus-class models, shipped with cyber safeguards enabled by default.

6. Updated tokenizer

  • Uses a new tokenizer (shared with the Opus 4.7/4.8 line) that can map the same text to up to 1.35x more tokens than Sonnet 4.6 - introductory pricing is set so the switch is roughly cost-neutral.
Appaca

Use GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on GPT-5.5, test the same tool on Claude 5 Sonnet, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is GPT-5.5 cheaper than Claude 5 Sonnet?

Claude 5 Sonnet is generally cheaper: $3 input / $15 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $30 for GPT-5.5. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet?

They are equal: both GPT-5.5 and Claude 5 Sonnet support a 1M tokens context window.

Should I use GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on GPT-5.5, test the same tool on Claude 5 Sonnet, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use GPT-5.5 and Claude 5 Sonnet without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-5.5, Claude 5 Sonnet, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with GPT-5.5 or Claude 5 Sonnet

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.