VS

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok 4

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for Claude 3.5 Sonnet by Anthropic and Grok 4 by xAI - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

A fast, mid-tier model offering top-tier intelligence, strong reasoning, and advanced coding/vision capabilities at low cost.

View Claude 3.5 Sonnet
text

Grok 4

A flagship multimodal model excelling in natural language, math, and deep reasoning with unmatched all-around performance.

View Grok 4

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok 4 at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec Claude 3.5 Sonnet Grok 4
Provider Anthropic xAI
Model type Text Text
Context window 200K tokens 256K tokens
Input price $3 / 1M tokens $3 / 1M tokens
Output price $15 / 1M tokens $15 / 1M tokens
Status Superseded by Claude 4.5 Sonnet Current
Key differences

How Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok 4 differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok 4.

  • Both models cost the same on input: $3 per million tokens.

  • Context windows are close: Claude 3.5 Sonnet handles 200K tokens and Grok 4 handles 256K tokens.

  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet has been superseded by Claude 4.5 Sonnet - for new builds, consider the newer model first.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

1. Intelligence & Reasoning

  • Outperforms previous Claude models and competitor LLMs across major benchmarks.
  • Excels in graduate-level reasoning (GPQA), knowledge tasks (MMLU), and coding (HumanEval).
  • Handles nuance, humor, and complex instructions with human-like clarity.

2. Speed & Efficiency

  • Runs 2x faster than Claude 3 Opus, making it ideal for real-time and high-volume workflows.
  • Cost-effective pricing: $3/M input tokens and $15/M output tokens.
  • Supports a 200K token context window, enabling rich, long-form reasoning.

3. Coding Capabilities

  • Solves significantly more coding and bug-fix tasks (64% vs Opus's 38% in internal evaluations).
  • Can autonomously write, edit, and execute code when tool use is enabled.
  • Strong at translating and modernizing legacy codebases.

4. Vision Strength

  • Best vision model in the Claude family, surpassing Opus on vision benchmarks.
  • Excellent at interpreting charts, graphs, and imperfect images.
  • Reliable text extraction from low-quality visuals for retail, logistics, finance, etc.

5. Agentic Workflows

  • Highly capable for multi-step task orchestration.
  • Performs well as the engine for agents requiring reasoning, planning, and tool-calling abilities.

6. Content Quality

  • Produces natural, relatable writing with improved tone, style, and context awareness.
  • Strong at long-form content creation and editing.

7. Safety & Reliability

  • Rated ASL-2, meeting Anthropic's safety standards.
  • Undergoes extensive red-teaming and external evaluation (UK AISI & US AISI).
  • Not trained on user data without explicit permission.

Grok 4

1. Flagship-level reasoning and math performance

  • Designed for world-class reasoning depth, precision, and multi-step logical chains.
  • Excels at STEM, mathematics, symbolic operations, proofs, and analytical workloads.

2. Powerful multimodal understanding

  • Supports text, images, and other modalities.
  • Handles cross-modal reasoning tasks requiring context synthesis.

3. Extreme capability across diverse tasks

  • Positioned as a top-tier 'jack of all trades' model.
  • Strong in natural language, coding, knowledge retrieval, and structured generation.

4. Large 256K context window

  • Enables analysis of long documents, entire codebases, multi-document packs, and extensive agent sessions.
  • Supports workloads that require persistent reasoning across large inputs.

5. Advanced developer tooling support

  • Function calling for tool-augmented workflows.
  • Structured outputs for predictable, schema-controlled generation.
  • Integrates smoothly with agents and complex automation pipelines.

6. Efficient caching for cost reduction

  • Cached input tokens discounted to $0.75 / 1M tokens.
  • Encourages RAG, retrieval pipelines, and multi-step conversational workflows.

7. Production-ready performance

  • Stable rate limits: 480 requests per minute.
  • High token throughput: 2,000,000 tokens per minute.
  • Available across multiple xAI regional clusters.

8. Optional Live Search augmentation

  • Add-on: $25 per 1K sources.
  • Enhances factual accuracy and real-time information retrieval.
Appaca

Use Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4 - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4 - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on Claude 3.5 Sonnet, test the same tool on Grok 4, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4 - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Grok 4?

They cost the same overall: both charge $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens.

Which has the larger context window, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4?

Grok 4 has the larger context window at 256K tokens, compared to 200K tokens for Claude 3.5 Sonnet. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.

Should I use Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on Claude 3.5 Sonnet, test the same tool on Grok 4, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok 4 without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Grok 4, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.