VS

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude 4.7 Opus

Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI and Claude 4.7 Opus by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.

text

GPT-5.6 Sol

OpenAI's flagship model for complex professional work, combining frontier reasoning, coding, computer use, and long-horizon agentic performance with greater token efficiency.

View GPT-5.6 Sol
text

Claude 4.7 Opus

Anthropic's latest frontier Opus model, purpose-built for advanced software engineering, long-horizon agent work, and high-resolution multimodal reasoning.

View Claude 4.7 Opus

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude 4.7 Opus at a glance

Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.

Spec GPT-5.6 Sol Claude 4.7 Opus
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Model type Text Text
Context window 1.05M tokens 1M tokens
Input price $5 / 1M tokens $5 / 1M tokens
Output price $30 / 1M tokens $25 / 1M tokens
Status Current Superseded by Claude 4.8 Opus
Key differences

How GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude 4.7 Opus differ

What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude 4.7 Opus.

  • Both models cost the same on input: $5 per million tokens.

  • Claude 4.7 Opus is 17% cheaper on output tokens ($25 vs $30 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.

  • Context windows are close: GPT-5.6 Sol handles 1.05M tokens and Claude 4.7 Opus handles 1M tokens.

  • Claude 4.7 Opus has been superseded by Claude 4.8 Opus - for new builds, consider the newer model first.

Strengths side by side

Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.

GPT-5.6 Sol

1. Frontier Coding & Agentic Performance

  • Scores 88.8% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 72.7% on DeepSWE v1.1, with stronger performance across complex terminal workflows and long-horizon engineering.
  • Programmatic Tool Calling can coordinate tools, process intermediate results, and adapt workflows with fewer model round trips.

2. Maximum Capability on Demand

  • Adds max reasoning effort for difficult tasks that benefit from deeper exploration, checking, and revision.
  • Multi-agent ultra coordinates parallel agents for demanding work, reaching 91.9% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 92.2% on BrowseComp in OpenAI's evaluations.

3. Strong Computer Use, Design & Knowledge Work

  • Scores 62.6% on OSWorld 2.0 and 90.4% on BrowseComp in standard mode.
  • Produces more polished interfaces, presentations, documents, and spreadsheets while following reference formats more accurately.

4. Long Context & Broad Tool Support

  • Supports a 1.05M-token context window, up to 128K output tokens, and text plus image input.
  • Works with web search, file search, image generation, code interpreter, hosted shell, computer use, MCP, and other Responses API tools.

5. Stronger Science, Cybersecurity & Safeguards

  • Improves scientific and defensive cybersecurity performance, including 28.7% on GeneBench Pro and 73.5% on ExploitBench.
  • Uses layered safeguards, real-time checks, monitoring, and access controls for higher-risk capabilities.

Claude 4.7 Opus

1. State-of-the-art software engineering

  • A notable upgrade over Opus 4.6 on the hardest coding tasks, with users reporting they can hand off work that previously required close supervision.
  • Early partners reported double-digit gains on real-world benchmarks - e.g., Cursor saw CursorBench jump from 58% to 70%, and Rakuten-SWE-Bench resolution tripled versus Opus 4.6.
  • Handles complex, long-running tasks with rigor: plans carefully, catches its own logical faults, and verifies its outputs before reporting back.

2. Long-horizon agent reliability

  • Full 1M token context window at standard pricing, with state-of-the-art long-context consistency.
  • Far fewer tool errors, stronger recovery from tool failures, and better follow-through on multi-step workflows - designed for async work like CI/CD, automations, and managing multiple agents in parallel.
  • Stronger file-system-based memory, retaining useful notes across long, multi-session runs.

3. Sharper instruction following and honesty

  • Takes instructions literally and precisely - existing prompts may need re-tuning since earlier models were more lenient.
  • More honest about its own limits: reports missing data instead of fabricating plausible-but-wrong answers, and resists dissonant-data traps that tripped up Opus 4.6.

4. Substantially improved vision and multimodal reasoning

  • Accepts images up to 2,576 px on the long edge (~3.75 MP) - over 3x more than prior Claude models.
  • Unlocks dense-screenshot computer use, complex diagram extraction, and pixel-perfect reference tasks.
  • Stronger document reasoning for enterprise analysis (e.g., 21% fewer errors than Opus 4.6 on Databricks' OfficeQA Pro).

5. Top-tier professional knowledge work

  • State-of-the-art on the Finance Agent evaluation and GDPval-AA, with tighter, more professional finance analyses, models, and presentations.
  • Strong on legal work - e.g., 90.9% on BigLaw Bench at high effort, with better-calibrated reasoning on review tables and ambiguous edits.
  • Noted by design-focused partners as the best model for building dashboards and data-rich interfaces.

6. Modern effort and budget controls

  • Introduces a new xhigh effort level between high and max for finer control over reasoning vs. latency.
  • Task budgets (public beta) let developers guide token spend across long runs.
  • Recommended to start with high or xhigh effort for coding and agentic use cases.
Appaca

Use GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus - or both

Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus. No code, no API keys, no deployment.

Switch models without rebuilding

Start on GPT-5.6 Sol, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.

Automated for the whole team

Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.

Describe it, and it's built

Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus - connected to the tools you already use.

SlackGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveGoogle CalendarAirtableNotionWhatsappHubspot
Chat to app Appaca app builder

FAQs

Is GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper than Claude 4.7 Opus?

Claude 4.7 Opus is generally cheaper: $5 input / $25 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $30 for GPT-5.6 Sol. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.

Which has the larger context window, GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window at 1.05M tokens, compared to 1M tokens for Claude 4.7 Opus. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.

Should I use GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus?

It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on GPT-5.6 Sol, test the same tool on Claude 4.7 Opus, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.

Can I use GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude 4.7 Opus without writing code?

Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude 4.7 Opus, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.

Build AI tools with GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude 4.7 Opus

Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.