Claude 4.8 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare pricing, context windows, and strengths for Claude 4.8 Opus by Anthropic and Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic - and see how to put either to work in Appaca.
Claude 4.8 Opus
Anthropic's flagship model for coding and agents, building on Opus 4.7 with stronger reliability, a cheaper fast mode, and gains across coding, computer use, and professional work.
View Claude 4.8 OpusClaude 3.5 Haiku
A fast, affordable model matching Claude 3 Opus on many tasks while delivering major improvements in coding, accuracy, and tool use.
View Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude 4.8 Opus vs Claude 3.5 Haiku at a glance
Specs and pricing side by side, from the Appaca AI models directory.
| Spec | Claude 4.8 Opus | Claude 3.5 Haiku |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Model type | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 200K tokens |
| Input price | $5 / 1M tokens | $0.8 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $25 / 1M tokens | $4 / 1M tokens |
| Status | Current | Superseded by Claude 4.5 Haiku |
How Claude 4.8 Opus and Claude 3.5 Haiku differ
What the numbers mean in practice when choosing between Claude 4.8 Opus and Claude 3.5 Haiku.
-
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 84% cheaper on input tokens ($0.8 vs $5 per million), which adds up quickly in document-heavy workloads.
-
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 84% cheaper on output tokens ($4 vs $25 per million) - the bigger factor for tools that generate long documents.
-
Claude 4.8 Opus's 1M tokens context window is roughly 5x larger than Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200K tokens, so it can work across bigger codebases, contracts, or archives in one pass.
-
Claude 3.5 Haiku has been superseded by Claude 4.5 Haiku - for new builds, consider the newer model first.
Strengths side by side
Where each model shines, according to benchmarks and provider positioning.
Claude 4.8 Opus
1. Modest but tangible gains across the board
- 69.2% on SWE-bench Pro (+4.9 points over Opus 4.7's 64.3%), 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified, and a 1,890 Elo on GDPval-AA - about 121 Elo ahead of GPT-5.5.
- Anthropic frames it as an incremental refinement of Opus 4.7 rather than a step-change release.
2. The most reliable agent model Anthropic has shipped
- The only model to complete every case end-to-end on Anthropic's internal Super-Agent benchmark, beating prior Opus models and GPT-5.5 at parity on cost.
- Leads CursorBench across every effort level with more efficient tool calling - fewer steps for the same intelligence.
- 84% on Online-Mind2Web and stronger OSWorld-Verified scores make it the strongest computer-use and browser-agent model Anthropic has tested.
3. New highs for professional and legal work
- Highest score ever recorded on Anthropic's Legal Agent Benchmark, and the first model to break 10% on its all-pass standard.
- Roughly a 4x improvement in honesty and calibrated uncertainty versus Opus 4.7 on Anthropic's evaluations.
4. Cheaper, faster controls
- Standard pricing holds at $5/M input and $25/M output, unchanged from Opus 4.7.
- Fast mode now runs at 2.5x speed for $10/M input and $50/M output - about a third of what fast mode cost on prior Opus releases.
- A new effort dial gives finer control over how hard the model works before answering.
5. Long-horizon agent workflows
- 1M token context window in beta and up to 128K output tokens.
- Introduces Dynamic Workflows (research preview) in Claude Code - Opus can write its own orchestration script and run up to 16 concurrent / 1,000 total subagents in a single session.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
1. Intelligence & Benchmark Performance
- Matches Claude 3 Opus (previous largest model) on many intelligence tasks.
- Surpasses Claude 3 Opus on multiple evaluations despite being a smaller, faster model.
- Major improvements across every skill category vs previous Haiku.
2. Coding Strength
Scores 40.6% on SWE-bench Verified, outperforming:
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet (original version)
- GPT-4o
- Many agent-driven systems
Excellent for engineering assistants, agent coding tasks, and bug fixing.
3. Speed & Latency
- Same speed class as Claude 3 Haiku (ultra-fast).
- Ideal for real-time interactions, high request volumes, and UI responsiveness.
4. Tool Use & Instruction Following
- Better at following instructions than previous Haiku.
- Stronger at tool use accuracy, making it reliable for agents and workflows.
5. Best Use Cases
- High-volume, low-latency tasks
- User-facing products
- Sub-agent tasks in larger workflows
- Processing large structured datasets (pricing, inventory, purchase history)
- Rapid content or code generation where speed matters
Use Claude 4.8 Opus or Claude 3.5 Haiku - or both
Appaca is the AI workspace for operators. Build internal tools and AI co-workers powered by Claude 4.8 Opus or Claude 3.5 Haiku - connected to your real data and ready for your whole team. No code, no deployment.
Describe it, and it's built
Tell the Appaca agent the internal tool you need and it builds a working app powered by Claude 4.8 Opus or Claude 3.5 Haiku. No code, no API keys, no deployment.
Switch models without rebuilding
Start on Claude 4.8 Opus, test the same tool on Claude 3.5 Haiku, and keep whichever performs better - the rest of your app stays exactly as it is.
Automated for the whole team
Schedule tools to run on autopilot - daily digests, weekly reports, real-time triggers - and share them with your whole team from one workspace.
Describe it, and it's built
Tell the Appaca agent what your team needs and it builds a working app powered by Claude 4.8 Opus or Claude 3.5 Haiku - connected to the tools you already use.
Related comparisons
See how Claude 4.8 Opus and Claude 3.5 Haiku stack up against other models in the directory.
FAQs
Claude 3.5 Haiku is generally cheaper: $0.8 input / $4 output per million tokens, versus $5 / $25 for Claude 4.8 Opus. Actual cost depends on how many tokens your workload reads and writes.
Claude 4.8 Opus has the larger context window at 1M tokens, compared to 200K tokens for Claude 3.5 Haiku. A larger window means the model can consider more text at once - useful for long contracts, codebases, or months of records.
It depends on the job. Compare the pricing, context window, and strengths above against your workload - and remember the choice isn't permanent. In Appaca you can build a tool on Claude 4.8 Opus, test the same tool on Claude 3.5 Haiku, and switch at any time without rebuilding anything.
Yes. Appaca is a no-code AI workspace: describe the internal tool your team needs and the Appaca agent builds it as a working app powered by Claude 4.8 Opus, Claude 3.5 Haiku, or any other model in the directory - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No API keys to wire up and nothing to deploy.
Build AI tools with Claude 4.8 Opus or Claude 3.5 Haiku
Describe the tool your team needs and get a working app powered by the model you choose - with a built-in database, team access, and integrations. No code, no deployment.